The real cost of being a girl…

360, that’s the average number of weeks a women will spend on her period in her lifetime. If you were to do that time consecutively that’s nearly 7 years. Nearly 7 years of our lives on our period. As if it wasn’t bad enough that we have to deal with the fluctuation in hormones, the change in our bodies, and the inconvenience of actually bleeding consistently for up to seven days, but we have to pay for the privilege! To continue with our day to day lives and being general badasses we have to use tampons, sanitary towels, menstrual cups etc. Not only do we have to pay for these things, we have to pay tax on them too since they’re not considered a necessity. I’d put my life on it that it wasn’t a woman that made that rule!

Some states have been working to change this, but most still have to pay. My fellow family and friends in the UK still have to pay this premium too, even though it is a reduced rate of 5%. The good news is though, we are living in an age where change is absolutely possible! In 2015 Canada removed tax on feminine hygiene products after an online petition received more than 10,000 signatures, this sparked arguments around the world and India also scrapped their 12% tax on sanitary napkins in 2018, along with Australia who finally won an 18 year campaign to get rid of the 10% tax on feminine products.

Unfortunately, the tax that women have to pay, just for being women, doesn’t end there. There is such a thing as the Pink Tax. No I’m not kidding, or being dramatic. Studies have shown that the cost of being a woman literally is higher than that of a man. The New York City department of consumer affairs did a study which proved that girls toys and accessories were 7% more than boys, and clothing 4%. Women’s clothing came out 8% more than mens clothes, and personal care products, a whopping 13% more expensive for women! It doesn’t stop there, as seniors women can expect to pay 8% more for home health care and other related products than compared to men of the same age. The results showed that women’s products cost more than men’s 42% of the time!! And men’s products cost more that women’s only 18% of the time.

If that wasn’t enough to shock you, check this out. In one of the studies they did they found a red “My 1st Scooter” aimed at boys for $24.99, at the same store, a pink “My 1st Scooter Sparkle” for EXACTLY the same scooter but just with some added glitter for $49.99! When the store was confronted about the study they claimed it was a “system error” and shortly after it was removed from sale all together. 

In 1994, a study of gender based pricing in California showed that on average women will pay a “gender tax” of approximately $1,351 per year more than men for the same services.

More awareness needs to be made about this subject, this is 2019 and buying tampons and sanitary towels shouldn’t be considered a luxury. At the end of 2018, Nevada became the tenth state in the US to eliminate tax on sanitary products a long with New York, Florida and Illinois. 

100 years is a long time, that’s how long it’s been since women were given the right to vote, and we’ve come a long way but not far enough, we still have a way to go. So let’s keep making noise about it! Help me spread the word and build awareness about this. 

35 thoughts on “The real cost of being a girl…

  1. Absolutely right. As they say there are only two ‘givens’ in life, death and taxes. We can do something about unfair taxes if we make enough noise.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. There is no doubt that women get the short end when it comes to female issues here in the States and it sounds like this issue is pretty much universal. I as a guy have always been really thankful that we do not have to deal with the issues that the ladies have to deal with. I think this is a very good article so I am going to reblog this one for you.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. They used to charge women for alterations to their clothing, but not men. After women demanded that stop…it did. I agree. All of these things are just ways to keep women poor and I think it’s also a punishment for being female. Patriarchy is alive and well and it is the enemy.

    Like

  4. That’s amazing, but the sad part is that it doesn’t surprise me! You’re always one step away from the Handmaids Tale!! Keep shouting it out 😉

    Like

    1. Investment? I’m not sure I agree. Buying things like tampons and sanitary towels is not a way to invest, that money is done and spent. Every month it’s disposed of and thrown in the trash, but we have to keep spending the money to get through day to day life of going out to work and through life.

      Like

      1. Point taken. I’m sorry for my poor choice in words. Hygiene products are one thing that are a necessary expense and as you said disposable. I should not comment when I have had little sleep. Please forgive

        Like

  5. Interesting article. One keeps hearing more about gender equality and harassment etc but the cost of being a girl is interesting!
    On a brighter note : In India senior females get bigger concession on rail travel than males. 50% v/s 40% 😊

    Like

  6. Great post, will reblog it if you don’t mind … buy shares in the feminine product companies and you will be assured of a profit … we can’t go without them!

    Like

  7. You might also be interested to read about what my home city of New York did, just in case you weren’t already aware. The mayor signed this into law: https://slate.com/human-interest/2016/06/new-york-city-council-votes-to-give-free-tampons-and-pads-to-women-in-schools-prisons-and-shelters.html

    Obviously, this doesn’t take care of nearly everything, but what was done by NYC here seems like a good start (unless I’m misunderstanding things).

    Like

    1. Wow, that’s great, but what about the women not in shelters or prison that are still living in poverty, that still have to prioritise food on the table for their families or menstrual products. Let’s not stop until we can make a change!

      Like

      1. Agreed. And you definitely pointed out a shortcoming–that women who are in poverty are not addressed by the legislation (not to mention that many places don’t even do what NYC now does).

        Like

Leave a reply to Chocoviv Cancel reply